provided übersetzung

Übersetzung im Kontext von „is provided“ in Englisch-Deutsch von Reverso Context: is provided between, device is provided, is provided with at least one. provided (that) übersetzen: при условии что. Erfahren Sie mehr. Viele übersetzte Beispielsätze mit "provided that" – Deutsch-Englisch Wörterbuch und Suchmaschine für Millionen von Deutsch-Übersetzungen.

Es kommt darauf an. That fact escaped me. Diese Tatsache entging mir. Stell dir das vor! Das ist der Gipfel!

Aus dem Umfeld der Suche equipped. Forum discussions containing the search term provided that vs. The teacher will get angr… 17 Replies provided that Last post 27 Oct 08, Ergibt dieser in einem englischen Originaltext enthaltene Sa… 1 Replies "provided that" vs.

Bei einer Aufgabe muss jewei… 25 Replies provided that - vorausgesetzt Last post 10 Feb 11, In need of language advice?

Get help from other users in our forums. Such agreement must be concluded in writing or, should it have been concluded orally, must be confirmed in writing.

The legal dispute concerns non-pecuniary claims that are assigned to the local courts Amtsgerichte, AG without consideration of the value of the subject matter being litigated, or.

An exclusive jurisdiction has been established for the complaint. In all matters in which he himself is a party, or in which his relationship to one of the parties in the proceedings is that of a co-obligee, co-obligor, or a party liable to recourse;.

In all matters concerning his partner or former partner under a civil union;. In all matters concerning persons who are or were directly related to him, either by blood or by marriage, or who are or were related as third-degree relatives in the collateral line, or who are or were second-degree relatives by marriage in the collateral line;.

In all matters in which he was appointed as attorney of record or as a person providing assistance to a party, or in which he is or was authorised to make an appearance as a legal representative of a party;.

In all matters in which he is examined as a witness or expert;. In all matters in which he assisted, at a prior level of jurisdiction or in arbitration proceedings, in entering the contested decision, unless this concerns activities of a judge correspondingly delegated or requested.

In all matters concerning court procedures of excessive duration, if he assisted in the impugned proceedings at the level of jurisdiction, the duration of which is the basis for the claim to compensation.

In all matters in which he assisted in mediation proceedings or in any other alternative conflict resolution procedures. A party may no longer recuse a judge for fear of bias if that party has made an appearance before said judge at a hearing, or filed petitions, without asserting the reasons for recusal of which it is aware.

By way of demonstrating the grounds for recusal, the testimony of the judge being recused may be referred to. No decision need be handed down where the judge regarding whom a motion for recusal has been filed believes this motion to be justified.

If the motion for recusal is declared justified, the part of the hearing that took place after the motion was filed is to be repeated. The court competent for conclusively dealing with the motion to recuse a judge is to decide on the matter also in those cases in which such a motion is not appropriate, but in which the judge notifies the court that a relationship exists that might justify his recusal, or in which other reasons give rise to concerns that the judge might be disqualified by law.

The stipulations of the present Title shall apply mutatis mutandis also to the records clerk of the court registry; the decision shall be handed down by the court at which that records clerk is employed.

Where a person having the capacity to sue or be sued is represented by a custodian or curator, that person shall have the equivalent position in the legal dispute as a person who is under legal disability.

Individual actions to be taken in the proceedings, for which special authorisation is required under the stipulations of civil law, shall be valid also without such authorisation if the authorisation was granted for the pursuit of the proceedings in general, or if the pursuit of such proceedings is an available remedy also without such general authorisation.

A foreigner who, according to the laws of his country, lacks the capacity to sue and be sued, shall be deemed to have such capacity if, pursuant to the laws to which the court hearing the case is subject, he is entitled to such capacity to sue and be sued.

The final judgment may be delivered only after the period determined for the remediation of the lack has expired. A plurality of persons may jointly sue or be sued as joined parties if they form a community of interest with regard to the disputed right, or if they are entitled or obligated for the same factual and legal cause.

A plurality of persons may also jointly sue or be sued as joined parties if similar claims or obligations form the subject matter in dispute and such claims are based on an essentially similar factual and legal cause.

Unless stipulated otherwise by civil law or the present Code, joined parties shall deal with their opponent as individuals in such a form that the actions of one of the joined parties will neither benefit the other joined party nor place it at a disadvantage.

Each of the joined parties is entitled to the right to pursue the proceedings; the entirety of all joined parties is to be summoned to the hearings.

Anyone asserting a claim to the object or the right regarding which a legal dispute is pending between other persons, either as a whole or in part, shall be entitled, until a final and binding judgment has been handed down on that dispute, to assert his claim by filing a complaint against both of the parties with the court before which the legal dispute became pending in the proceedings in the first instance.

Upon corresponding application being made by a party, the main proceedings may be suspended until a final and binding judgment has been handed down regarding the third-party intervention through an action brought against the two parties to a pending lawsuit.

The third party intervening in support of a party to the dispute must enter into the legal dispute in whatever situation the dispute may be in at the time the third party is acceding to it; the third party is entitled to assert means of challenge or defence and to effectively take all actions in the proceedings such that they are valid, provided that its declarations and actions are not in opposition to the declarations made and actions taken by the primary party.

The written pleading is to be served on both parties and must include:. Exact information regarding the interest of the third party in intervening in support of a party to the dispute;.

The intervening third party shall be admitted to accede to the proceedings provided it has demonstrated its interest in so doing to the satisfaction of the court.

In order to file third-party notice, the party so filing it is to submit a written pleading in which the reasons for filing such third-party notice and the status of the legal dispute are to be set out.

The written pleading is to be served on the third party, and a copy of same is to be communicated to the opponent of the party filing the third-party notice.

The third-party notice shall become valid only upon its having been served on the third party. Where a debtor who has been sued serves third-party notice upon a third party, asserting that he is entitled to the claim brought, and where the third party accedes to the dispute, the defendant is to be released from the legal dispute, upon his filing the corresponding petition, provided that he has lodged the amount of the claim to the benefit of the creditors who are in dispute, and has waived the right to take this amount back; the defendant is to be sentenced to pay the costs arising as a consequence of any unfounded objection, and litigation as to entitlement to the claim is to be continued among the disputing creditors alone.

The prevailing creditor shall be awarded the amount lodged, and the creditor who has not been able to enforce his claim in the dispute shall be sentenced to reimbursing the original defendant for the costs that were not caused by his unfounded objection, including the lodgment costs of the amount in dispute.

Until such reaction in substance, or until the closure of the hearing at which the identified party is to so react in substance, the defendant may refuse to allow the matter to be heard on its merits.

The decision handed down by the court is also valid and enforceable against the defendant where the subject matter as such is concerned. In proceedings before the Federal Court of Justice Bundesgerichtshof, BGH , the parties to the dispute must be represented by an attorney admitted to practice before said court.

Above and beyond this, the following are authorised to represent parties as attorneys-in-fact:. Consumer centres and other publicly subsidised consumer associations, where they are collecting claims of consumers in the context of their scope of responsibilities;.

Attorneys-in-fact who are not individuals will act through their governing bodies and the representatives charged with representing them in the proceedings.

Actions taken in the proceedings by an attorney-in-fact who does not have the power of representation, as well as the service of documents on this attorney-in-fact, or notice given to him, will be valid until the date on which the court refuses to accept him.

The power of attorney is to be submitted in writing for the files of the court. It may be submitted retroactively; the court may determine a time limit in this regard.

The power of attorney for the main proceedings comprises the power of attorney for proceedings in which a third-party intervention is pursued by bringing an action against the two parties to a pending lawsuit, as well as for proceedings concerning a seizure or an injunction.

Where several attorneys of record have been authorised, they shall have the right to represent the party both jointly and individually.

Any stipulation in the power of attorney in derogation herefrom will not have any legal effect vis-а-vis the opponent. This applies to admissions and any other declarations as to fact insofar as they are not immediately recanted or corrected by the party appearing at the hearing along with his representatives.

The final judgment may be delivered only after the period for submitting the approval has expired. Anyone may be an adviser who is authorised to represent a party as an attorney-in-fact in a hearing in proceedings in which the party may pursue the legal dispute itself.

The court may admit other persons as advisers provided this serves the purpose intended, and provided the circumstances of the individual case indicate that a corresponding need exists.

The compensation of costs also comprises compensation of the opponent for any necessary travel or for time the opponent has lost by having been required to make an appearance at hearings; the rules governing the compensation of witnesses shall apply mutatis mutandis.

However, the travel expenses of an attorney who has not established himself in the judicial district of the court hearing the case, and who does not reside at the location of the court hearing the case, shall be compensated only insofar as it was necessary to involve him in order to bring an appropriate action, or to appropriately defend against an action brought by others.

The costs of retaining several attorneys shall be compensated only insofar as they do not exceed the costs of a single attorney, or insofar as personal reasons required an attorney to be replaced by another.

Where an attorney represents himself, he shall be reimbursed for those fees and expenditures that he could demand as fees and expenditures had he been granted power of attorney to represent another party.

The court is to hear the opponent prior to handing down its decision on the complaint. If the costs have been cancelled against each other, the parties shall bear the court costs at one half each.

The amount the other party claimed in excess was relatively small, or has resulted in only slightly higher costs, or. The amount of the claim brought by the other party depended on the judges determining it at their discretion, on the assessment by experts, or on the parties settling their reciprocal claims.

Where the defendant has not given cause for an action to be brought, the plaintiff shall bear the costs of the proceedings should the defendant immediately acknowledge the claim.

This shall apply mutatis mutandis to any legal dispute for continuation of the tenancy relationship where the complaint is dismissed.

This shall apply mutatis mutandis to any legal dispute for continuation of the tenancy relationship where the court finds for the party filing the complaint.

In cases in which the plaintiff asserts and files a claim that has devolved upon him, without having informed the defendant of such devolution prior to bringing the proceedings in the courts, he shall bear the costs of the proceedings insofar as they have arisen because the defendant had cause to dispute the claim as the plaintiff had failed to so give notice of the devolution, or to prove it by supporting documents.

The party that fails to attend a hearing or to meet a deadline shall bear the costs arising therefrom; this shall also apply if the party, through its fault, has caused a hearing to be deferred or a hearing for oral argument to be postponed, or if it has caused a hearing to be arranged at which the hearing for oral argument is to be continued, or a period to be extended.

Where the means of challenge or defence brought have not met with success, their costs may be imposed on the party that has availed itself of such means, even in those cases in which it has prevailed on the merits of the case.

The costs of any settlement shall be deemed to have been cancelled against each other unless otherwise agreed by the parties to the dispute.

The same shall apply regarding the costs of the legal dispute that has been dealt with and terminated by settlement, unless a final and binding decision has been delivered in their regard.

The opponent is to be heard prior to the decision being taken on the complaint. The computation of the costs, the copy intended for forwarding to the opponent, and the proof serving to justify the individual cost items are to be attached to the petition.

Where the petition is complied with fully or in part, the decision is to be served ex officio on the opponent of the petitioner, with a copy of the computation of the costs being enclosed.

The decision is to be served ex officio on the petitioner only in those cases in which the petition is dismissed as a whole or in part; in all other instances, the decision shall be communicated by simple letter.

As regards the expenditures an attorney has incurred for postage and telecommunications services, his assurance that such expenditures have been incurred shall be sufficient substantiation.

The court with which the complaint is lodged may suspend the proceedings until the decision on which the petition for assessment of costs is based has become final and binding.

The document is to be joined to the judgment such that it cannot be separated. The court order assessing the costs shall not be joined to the judgment where the petition regarding the assessment of costs is not complied with, and also where it is not complied with only in part.

The opponent shall be liable for the additional costs arising as a result of the proceedings for retroactive reimbursement. The court of first instance shall decide on said application.

The period shall commence upon service of the order assessing the value of the subject matter being litigated and, where no such service is required, upon its pronouncement.

The order shall become effective only once it has become final and binding. The decisions are issued by a court order. Where, due to international treaties, no such security deposit may be demanded;.

Where the plaintiff possesses real estate assets, or claims secured in rem, in Germany that suffice to cover the costs of the proceedings;.

Where proceedings have been brought in the courts based on public notice given by a court. The defendant may demand a security deposit to be made for the costs of the proceedings if the prerequisites for such an obligation to provide security arise only in the course of the legal dispute, unless a part of the claim brought before the courts is undisputed among the parties and would suffice to cover such costs.

The costs that will accrue to the defendant if it brings countercharges shall not be taken into account in this context. In issuing the order that the plaintiff is to provide security, the court is to determine a period within which the security is to be provided.

Upon the period expiring, and upon a corresponding application being made by the defendant, the action is to be declared as having been withdrawn if the security has not been provided by the date of the decision by the court; in the event oral argument is to be heard regarding appellate remedies sought by the plaintiff, these remedies are to be overruled.

Wherever the present title is silent, sections through shall apply to assistance with court costs in cross-border disputes within the European Union.

The costs of residential accommodation and heating costs, insofar as they are not obviously disproportionate to the general life circumstances of the party concerned;.

The amounts in force at the time at which assistance with court costs is approved shall govern. Where these amounts are not full amounts in euros, they are to be rounded down where they are equal to 0.

Should an annuity be paid, it is to be deducted instead of the allowance amount wherever reasonable. Where the amount of a monthly instalment is lower than 10 euros, the assessment of monthly instalments is to be desisted from.

Where the income to be used is greater than euros, the monthly instalment shall amount to euros plus that part of the income to be used that is in excess of euros.

As a maximum, and regardless of the number of court instances in which the proceedings are pursued, a maximum of 48 monthly instalments are to be paid.

Upon corresponding application being made, assistance with court costs shall be approved for parties:.

Who are a party by virtue of their office, if the costs cannot be funded from the available assets administered by that party and it cannot reasonably be expected of the parties economically involved in the subject matter in dispute to contribute to the payment of these costs;.

Who are a legal person or an organisation that has the capacity to be a party and that was established in Germany, in another Member State of the European Union, or in any other signatory state of the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and which have their registered seat there, if the costs cannot be funded by that party nor by the parties economically involved in the subject matter in dispute, and if any failure to bring an action or to defend against an action that has been brought would contradict the public interest.

Should the costs be funded only in part or in partial amounts, the corresponding amounts are to be paid. The application is to summarise the case and is to cite the evidence.

The application for approval of assistance with court costs in the event of compulsory enforcement is to be filed with the court having jurisdiction for compulsory enforcement.

Prior to his declaration being forwarded to the opponent, the applicant is to be given the opportunity to state his position. The applicant is to be informed of the fact that the declaration has been forwarded.

This position statement may be recorded with the registry for the files of the court. If it is to be expected that the parties will settle, the court may summon the parties to the dispute for a discussion of the matter in person; the court is to record any settlement reached.

Any costs incurred by the opponent will not be reimbursed. It may order information to be procured from the authorities, and it may in particular order the submission of records and procure information.

No witnesses or experts shall be examined, unless it cannot be established by any other means whether or not the action brought by a party, or the defence against an action brought by others against it, holds out sufficient prospects of success and does not seem frivolous; none of the parties shall be placed under oath.

Should, within a period set by the court, the applicant fail to substantiate information he has provided regarding his personal and economic circumstances, or should he fail to answer certain questions, or not answer them to the satisfaction of the court, the court shall refuse to approve assistance with court costs in this regard.

Wherever the opponent has filed an appeal, it shall not be reviewed at any higher level of jurisdiction whether the action brought by a party, or the defence against an action brought by others, holds out sufficient prospects of success or seems frivolous.

If the payments made by the party will cover the costs foreseeably arising;. If the party, counsel assigned to it or the Federal cash office or the Land cash office are able to assert the costs against another party involved in the proceedings.

Should the court so demand, the party must disclose at any time whether or not its circumstances have changed. Such change shall not take any effect to the detriment of the party if four 4 years have lapsed since the decision of the court has entered into force or the proceedings have been terminated by other means.

Where the party earns a monthly income on a regular basis, the improvement of the income shall be deemed to be significant only if the difference to the gross income thus far serving as the basis is higher than euro, and that on any other than a non-recurrent basis.

The second sentence shall apply mutatis mutandis inasmuch as deductible obligations have ceased to exist. The court is to review, after the ruling has become res judicata or after the proceedings have been otherwise terminated, whether or not a modification of the ruling regarding the payments to be made is required in light of what has been obtained by the action brought or defended against.

A modification of the decision is ruled out when the party would have been granted assistance with court costs without having to make payments in instalments, had whatever the party obtained by the action brought or by the defence against an action brought against it been paid or provided in due time.

The Federal or Land cash office being able to assert against the party, exclusively in accordance with the provisions made by the court,.

Releasing the party from the obligation to provide a security deposit for the costs of the proceedings;. Prohibiting the attorneys assigned as counsel from asserting claims to remuneration against the party.

The approval of assistance with court costs does not affect the obligation to reimburse the opponent for the costs it has incurred. The party has misrepresented the prerequisites, based on which an approval of assistance with court costs is granted, by falsely summarising the case;.

The party has been in arrears for longer than three 3 months with the payment of a monthly instalment or with the payment of any other amount.

The opponent may set off, from any amounts it is to pay, the costs that are to be reimbursed by the party according to the decision as to the costs that is handed down in the same legal dispute.

The court of first instance is the competent court in this regard; should the proceedings be pending at a higher level of jurisdiction, the court of that instance is the competent court.

The statutory period shall be one 1 month. Such contestation may only be based on the fact that the party is to make payments based on its personal and economic circumstances.

The statutory period shall be one 1 month and shall begin running upon the court order having been issued. Following the expiry of three 3 months from the pronouncement of the decision, such appeal will no longer be an available remedy.

Should the decision not be pronounced, the time at which the signed decision is submitted to the court registry shall take the stead of the pronouncement.

The Treasury will not be informed ex officio of the decision. The court shall determine, at its earliest convenience, the deadline for written pleadings to be submitted, and shall determine the date of the hearing on which the decision is to be pronounced.

A decision given without a hearing for oral argument is inadmissible should more than three 3 months have lapsed since the parties granted their consent.

In this event, the images and sound of the hearing shall be broadcast in real time to this location and to the courtroom. The images and sound of the examination shall be broadcast in real time to this location and to the courtroom.

A procedural action shall become effective at the earliest when the record is received by that court. Provided that the person so filing the petition or making the declaration for the record has consented, he may be charged with transmitting the record to the court.

The designation of the parties and their legal representatives by name, status or business, place of residence and position as a party; the designation of the court and of the subject matter of the litigation; the number of annexes;.

The petitions that the party intends to file with the court at the session;. Information on the factual circumstances serving as grounds for the petitions;.

The declarations regarding the facts alleged by the opponent;. The designation of the evidence that the party intends to submit as proof of any facts alleged, or by way of rebutting allegations, as well as a declaration regarding the evidence designated by the opponent;.

The signature of the person responsible for the written pleading; if it is transmitted by telefax telecopier , the signature shall be shown in the copy.

The person responsible for the written pleading is to furnish the document with a qualified electronic signature pursuant to the Electronic Signature Act Signaturgesetz.

If an electronic document transmitted is not suited for processing by the court, this shall be communicated to its sender without undue delay, specifying the applicable technical framework conditions.

The Land governments may confer, by statutory instrument, the authorisation upon the Land departments of justice. The admissibility of the electronic form may also be restricted to individual courts or proceedings.

To the extent the present Code stipulates that judges, senior judicial officers, records clerks of the court registry, or court-appointed enforcement officers are to sign documents by hand, the recording of documents as electronic documents shall comply with this requirement wherever the persons responsible for such documents add their names and furnish the documents with a qualified electronic signature.

The Federal Ministry of Justice may introduce electronic forms, doing so by statutory instrument; this shall be subject to approval by the Bundesrat.

The statutory instrument may determine that the information provided in the forms is to be transmitted, either in its entirety or in part, in structured, machine-readable format.

The forms are to be made available for use on a communications platform on the internet determined in the statutory instrument.

This shall apply to any written pleading that concerns interlocutory proceedings. This shall not apply to any written response made in interlocutory proceedings.

This shall not apply to any documents transmitted electronically, nor shall it apply to annexes that are available to the opponent in their original versions or as copies.

Upon corresponding application being made, the presiding judge may extend or shorten this period. Should a member of the court so request, he shall allow that member to ask questions.

Documents will be read out only insofar as their exact wording is relevant. The court is to work towards ensuring that the parties to the dispute make declarations in due time and completely, regarding all significant facts, and in particular is to ensure that the parties amend by further information those facts that they have asserted only incompletely, that they designate the evidence, and that they file the relevant petitions.

The same shall apply for any aspect that the court assesses differently than both parties do. The fact of such notice having been given may be proven only by the content of the files.

The content of the files may be challenged exclusively by submitting proof that they have been forged. Where a person involved in the hearing objects to an order issued by the presiding judge concerning his power to control the subject matter of the litigation, by stating that such order is inadmissible, or where a question asked by the presiding judge or by a member of the court is so objected to as being inadmissible, the court shall decide on such objection.

If, in light of the great distance a party would have to travel, or for other grave cause, it cannot be reasonably expected of a party to appear in person at the hearing, the court is to refrain from ordering such party to appear in person.

The summons shall be communicated to the party itself also in those cases in which it has retained an attorney of record; the summons need not be served on the party.

This shall not apply if the party has sent a representative to the hearing who is able to clear up the elements of the case and is authorised to make the declarations mandated, in particular to conclude a settlement.

The summons is to set out the consequences that may arise for the party should it fail to appear at the hearing.

The court may set a deadline in this regard and may direct that the material so produced remain with the court registry for a period to be determined by the court.

The translation shall be deemed to be true and complete where this is confirmed by the translator. It is admissible to prove that the translation is incorrect or incomplete.

The order provided for in the first sentence hereof may not be issued to the third party. The court may direct the parties to the dispute to produce the files in their possession to the extent they consist of documents concerning the hearing on the matter and the decision by the court.

For this purpose, it may direct that a party to the proceedings or a third party produce an object in its possession, and may set a corresponding deadline therefor.

The court may also direct that a party is to tolerate a measure taken under the first sentence hereof, unless this measure concerns a residence.

The decision shall be issued by a court order and shall cite the reasons on which it is based. Insofar as several independent means of challenge or defence refer to one and the same claim causes of action, defence pleas, counterpleas, etc.

Wherever the claims forming the subject matter of several proceedings pending with a court, whether involving the same or different parties, have legal ties amongst each other, or wherever they could have been asserted in one single complaint, the court may direct that such proceedings be consolidated in order to be heard and decided on at the same time.

Where the decision on a legal dispute depends either wholly or in part on the question of whether a legal relationship does or does not exist, and this relationship forms the subject matter of another legal dispute that is pending, or that is to be determined by an administrative agency, the court may direct that the hearing be suspended until the other legal dispute has been dealt with and terminated, or until the administrative agency has issued its decision.

This shall not apply if important reasons indicate that the suspension should be upheld. The court may repeal the orders it has delivered regarding the separation, consolidation, or suspension of proceedings.

Where the decision on a legal dispute depends on whether or not a marriage can be annulled, and where such annulment has been petitioned, the court is to suspend the proceedings upon corresponding application having been made.

Where the annulment proceedings have been dealt with and terminated, the suspended proceedings shall be resumed. In proceedings which the parties to the legal dispute may pursue themselves, the attorney of record acting for a party may delegate his authority to a post-graduate legal trainee Referendar who has been assigned to work for him in his preparatory service.

Where a person involved in the hearing has been removed from the location at which the hearing is held in order to maintain order in the court, this person may be proceeded against, upon a corresponding petition being filed, in the same manner as if he had voluntarily left the hearing.

A records clerk of the court registry may be involved in order to keep the record if this is required due to the expected scope of the record, in light of the particular complexity of the matter, or for any other grave cause.

The names of the judges, of the records clerk of the court registry, and of any interpreter who may have been involved;. The information that the hearing was held in open court or in camera.

Any acknowledgments, abandonments of claims, and settlements;. Any admission and declaration as to a petition for the examination of a party, as well as any other declarations the determination of which is required;.

The testimony by witnesses, experts and parties examined; in the event of a repeated examination, the testimony need be included in the record of the hearing only insofar as it deviates from the testimony previously given;.

The decisions judgments, orders, and rulings of the court;. The court may refrain from so including them if the determination of the actions and events or of the statements is not relevant.

Such order shall not be contestable and is to be included in the record of the hearing. The record of the hearing is to be amended by these determinations should a party petition that this be done prior to the proceedings having been concluded as res judicata, or where the court of appeal requires such amendment to be made.

Recordings made on sound or data carriers may be deleted:. To the extent the record of the hearing has been created following the session of the court or is amended by the determinations noted on a preliminary basis, provided that the parties to the dispute have not lodged any objections within one 1 month of the copy having been communicated to them;.

Following the conclusion of the proceedings by a final and binding judgment. Insofar as the court has available a central data storage facility, the preliminary notes may be stored in such central data storage facility instead of being stored as set out in the first sentence hereof.

Where the court hearing the case performs the examination or takes visual evidence on site, and where the final judgment is not subject to appeal or to an appeal on points of law;.

To the extent the complaint is retracted, the claim being enforced is acknowledged or waived, and appellate remedies are waived or the legal dispute is terminated by settlement.

Should the content of the record have been noted only on a preliminary basis, reading the notes or replaying the sound recording shall be deemed compliant with the present rule.

The record of the hearing is to note that this has been done and that the record has been approved, or it shall note the objections that have been raised.

Should the content of the record of the hearing, as a whole or in part, have been recorded on a preliminary basis using a sound recorder, the records clerk of the court registry is to check that the content has been correctly word-processed and is to confirm that this has been done; this shall also apply if the records clerk of the court registry was not present at the session of the court.

The reasons preventing a judge from signing the record shall be noted in the record of the hearing. The teacher will get angr… 17 Replies More.

In need of language advice? Get help from other users in our forums. Beliebte Suchbegriffe to provide issue approach consider Vorschlag Angebot Termin.

Im Web und als APP. Die Vokabel wurde gespeichert, jetzt sortieren? Der Eintrag wurde im Forum gespeichert. LEO uses cookies in order to facilitate the fastest possible website experience with the most functions.

In some cases cookies from third parties are also used.

Wie kam er nur dazu? You ought to consider that Sie sollten bedenken, dass Es kommt darauf an. That fact escaped me. Diese Tatsache entging mir.

Stell dir das vor! Das ist der Gipfel! Aus dem Umfeld der Suche equipped. Forum discussions containing the search term provided that vs.

The teacher will get angr… 17 Replies provided that Last post 27 Oct 08, Ergibt dieser in einem englischen Originaltext enthaltene Sa… 1 Replies "provided that" vs.

Bei einer Aufgabe muss jewei… 25 Replies provided that - vorausgesetzt Last post 10 Feb 11, In need of language advice? Get help from other users in our forums.

Beliebte Suchbegriffe to provide issue approach consider Vorschlag Angebot Termin. Im Web und als APP. Die Vokabel wurde gespeichert, jetzt sortieren?

The summons shall be communicated to the party itself also in those cases in which it has retained an attorney of record; the summons need not be served on the party.

This shall not apply if the party has sent a representative to the hearing who is able to clear up the elements of the case and is authorised to make the declarations mandated, in particular to conclude a settlement.

The summons is to set out the consequences that may arise for the party should it fail to appear at the hearing. The court may set a deadline in this regard and may direct that the material so produced remain with the court registry for a period to be determined by the court.

The translation shall be deemed to be true and complete where this is confirmed by the translator. It is admissible to prove that the translation is incorrect or incomplete.

The order provided for in the first sentence hereof may not be issued to the third party. The court may direct the parties to the dispute to produce the files in their possession to the extent they consist of documents concerning the hearing on the matter and the decision by the court.

For this purpose, it may direct that a party to the proceedings or a third party produce an object in its possession, and may set a corresponding deadline therefor.

The court may also direct that a party is to tolerate a measure taken under the first sentence hereof, unless this measure concerns a residence.

The decision shall be issued by a court order and shall cite the reasons on which it is based. Insofar as several independent means of challenge or defence refer to one and the same claim causes of action, defence pleas, counterpleas, etc.

Wherever the claims forming the subject matter of several proceedings pending with a court, whether involving the same or different parties, have legal ties amongst each other, or wherever they could have been asserted in one single complaint, the court may direct that such proceedings be consolidated in order to be heard and decided on at the same time.

Where the decision on a legal dispute depends either wholly or in part on the question of whether a legal relationship does or does not exist, and this relationship forms the subject matter of another legal dispute that is pending, or that is to be determined by an administrative agency, the court may direct that the hearing be suspended until the other legal dispute has been dealt with and terminated, or until the administrative agency has issued its decision.

This shall not apply if important reasons indicate that the suspension should be upheld. The court may repeal the orders it has delivered regarding the separation, consolidation, or suspension of proceedings.

Where the decision on a legal dispute depends on whether or not a marriage can be annulled, and where such annulment has been petitioned, the court is to suspend the proceedings upon corresponding application having been made.

Where the annulment proceedings have been dealt with and terminated, the suspended proceedings shall be resumed.

In proceedings which the parties to the legal dispute may pursue themselves, the attorney of record acting for a party may delegate his authority to a post-graduate legal trainee Referendar who has been assigned to work for him in his preparatory service.

Where a person involved in the hearing has been removed from the location at which the hearing is held in order to maintain order in the court, this person may be proceeded against, upon a corresponding petition being filed, in the same manner as if he had voluntarily left the hearing.

A records clerk of the court registry may be involved in order to keep the record if this is required due to the expected scope of the record, in light of the particular complexity of the matter, or for any other grave cause.

The names of the judges, of the records clerk of the court registry, and of any interpreter who may have been involved;. The information that the hearing was held in open court or in camera.

Any acknowledgments, abandonments of claims, and settlements;. Any admission and declaration as to a petition for the examination of a party, as well as any other declarations the determination of which is required;.

The testimony by witnesses, experts and parties examined; in the event of a repeated examination, the testimony need be included in the record of the hearing only insofar as it deviates from the testimony previously given;.

The decisions judgments, orders, and rulings of the court;. The court may refrain from so including them if the determination of the actions and events or of the statements is not relevant.

Such order shall not be contestable and is to be included in the record of the hearing. The record of the hearing is to be amended by these determinations should a party petition that this be done prior to the proceedings having been concluded as res judicata, or where the court of appeal requires such amendment to be made.

Recordings made on sound or data carriers may be deleted:. To the extent the record of the hearing has been created following the session of the court or is amended by the determinations noted on a preliminary basis, provided that the parties to the dispute have not lodged any objections within one 1 month of the copy having been communicated to them;.

Following the conclusion of the proceedings by a final and binding judgment. Insofar as the court has available a central data storage facility, the preliminary notes may be stored in such central data storage facility instead of being stored as set out in the first sentence hereof.

Where the court hearing the case performs the examination or takes visual evidence on site, and where the final judgment is not subject to appeal or to an appeal on points of law;.

To the extent the complaint is retracted, the claim being enforced is acknowledged or waived, and appellate remedies are waived or the legal dispute is terminated by settlement.

Should the content of the record have been noted only on a preliminary basis, reading the notes or replaying the sound recording shall be deemed compliant with the present rule.

The record of the hearing is to note that this has been done and that the record has been approved, or it shall note the objections that have been raised.

Should the content of the record of the hearing, as a whole or in part, have been recorded on a preliminary basis using a sound recorder, the records clerk of the court registry is to check that the content has been correctly word-processed and is to confirm that this has been done; this shall also apply if the records clerk of the court registry was not present at the session of the court.

The reasons preventing a judge from signing the record shall be noted in the record of the hearing. The note is to be signed by the judge signing the record of the hearing, or by the judge sitting alone, even if he was prevented from signing the record, and by the records clerk of the court registry to the extent he was involved in the proceedings as the keeper of the record.

The document is to be joined to the record of the hearing such that it cannot be separated. Compliance with the formal requirements stipulated for the hearing can be proven only by the record of the hearing.

The exclusive means of admissibly challenging the content of the record concerning these formal requirements is the submission of proof that it has been forged.

The court registry shall award the contract to the postal service on the form intended for this purpose. This shall also apply unless an attorney has already certified the documents submitted to the court.

Instead of being signed by hand, the copy is to be furnished with the court seal. The same shall apply if a copy is served by telefax. The copy is to be furnished with the qualified digital signature of the records clerk of the court registry.

Any service made on the person incapable of conducting proceedings shall not be valid. Service on the representative appointed by legal transaction shall have the same effect as service on the party so represented.

The representative is to produce a written power of attorney. This shall apply also to procedural actions affecting the proceedings before the court of that level of jurisdiction as a result of: Proceedings before the court responsible for enforcement are proceedings at the first level of jurisdiction.

If an attorney of record has already been appointed for the higher level of jurisdiction, the written pleading is to be served on that attorney. Service shall be made on the party itself if the party has not appointed an attorney of record.

A document may be served on its addressee, or the representative appointed by legal transaction, by physically delivering it to the sub-office. The note is to be signed by the employee physically delivering the documents.

The same shall apply to other parties involved in the proceedings, provided they have expressly consented to the documents being transmitted as electronic documents.

The document is to be signed digitally for the transmission and is to be protected against its becoming known to unauthorised third parties. Should it be sent as an electronic document, it is to be signed by a qualified digital signature pursuant to the Electronic Signature Act Signaturgesetz.

A document may be served by registered mail, return receipt requested. Service shall be deemed sufficiently proven by the return receipt. The document may be physically submitted to the person on whom it is to be served at any location at which the person is found.

Should acceptance of the document to be served be refused without justification, the document is to be left at the residence or at the business premises.

Should the party on whom documents are to be served not have a residence, or should no business premises exist, the document to be served is to be returned.

Upon such refusal of acceptance, the document shall be deemed served. By this placement, the document shall be deemed served. The person so serving it shall note the date of service on the envelope of the document to be served.

Should the postal service have been contracted with serving the documents, the document to be served is to be deposited at the place of service or at the location of the local court at a point designated for this purpose by the postal service.

A written notice of such deposit is to be submitted at the address of the person on whom documents are to be served, using the corresponding form in the manner usual for the delivery of regular letters, or, should this not be possible, the written notice is to be affixed to the door of the residence, the business premises, or the institution.

Upon such written notification having been submitted, the document shall be deemed served. Following the expiry of this period, documents that have not been collected are to be returned to the sender.

The designation of the person on whom service is to be made,. The designation of the person to whom the letter or the document was physically submitted,.

The note that the day of service was noted on the envelope containing the document to be served,. The place, the date and, should the court registry so have instructed, also the time of service,.

The surname, given name, and signature of the person serving the documents as well as the name of the enterprise contracted for service, or the public authority charged with this task.

Wherever documents may be sent directly by the postal service based on such agreements in international instruments, they shall be served by registered mail, return receipt requested; in all other cases, service shall be made, at the request of the presiding judge of the court hearing the case, directly by the public authorities of the other state.

The procedure set out in the first sentence hereof is to be followed in particular if no agreements have been made in international instruments, if the competent bodies of the state concerned are not willing to provide legal assistance, or if special grounds justify such form of service.

Should no authorised recipient be named and until such recipient is named retroactively, documents may be served subsequently by being mailed to the address of the party.

The court may set a longer period. By way of recording proof of the documents having been served, it is to be noted in the files at which time and to which address the document was mailed.

The documents may be served by publishing a notice service by publication wherever:. The abode of a person is unknown and it is not possible to serve the documents upon a representative or authorised recipient,.

It is not possible to serve documents upon legal persons obligated to register a domestic business address with the Commercial Register, neither at the address entered therein nor at the address entered in the Commercial Register of a person authorised to receive service of documents, or at any other domestic address obtained without any investigations,.

It is not possible to serve documents abroad, or if such services does not hold out any prospect of success, or. The decision may be given without a hearing being held.

Additionally, the notification may be published in an electronic information and communications system established by the court for such notifications.

The notification must set out:. The person on whose behalf the documents are to be served,. The name of the party to whom documents are to be served and the address last known,.

The date, the reference number of the document, and the designation of the subject matter of the proceedings, as well as.

The notification must include the note that a document is being served by publication, that this service may trigger periods, and that once they have lapsed, the party to whom the documents are being served in this way may have forfeited rights.

The court hearing the case additionally may order the notification to be published once, or several times, in the Official Gazette Bundesanzeiger or in other publications.

The document shall be deemed served should one 1 month have lapsed since the notification has been displayed on the bulletin board.

The court hearing the case may set a longer period. Should it not be possible to prove that a document has been served in due form, or should the document have been received in violation of mandatory regulations governing service of documents, it shall be deemed served at that point in time at which the document was factually received by the person to whom service of the document was addressed, or could be addressed.

The Federal Ministry of Justice hereby is authorised to introduce forms serving the simplification and streamlining of the service of documents, such forms being subject to approval by the Bundesrat and being made by statutory instrument.

Insofar as it is admissible or required to serve documents at the instigation of the parties, the rules regarding ex officio service shall be applied mutatis mutandis unless otherwise provided for by the rules set out hereinbelow.

The court-appointed enforcement officer shall certify the copies; he may prepare any lacking copies himself. In this context, the court registry is to charge the court-appointed enforcement officer with the service.

Where service is effected by mailing the document, the date and the address at which the document was mailed are to be noted.

He shall attest on the original of the document to be served, or on a handover form to be attached to the original document, that the postal item has been submitted to the postal service, and that it bears: This also applies to written pleadings that, pursuant to the stipulations of the present Code, are to be served ex officio: The written pleading is to set out the declaration that service on the other attorney will be effected by the attorney.

To the extent required for the decision to be taken, supporting documentary proof is to be provided to the court that the documents have so been served.

The period that is to lapse, in a matter that is pending, between the date on which the summons was served and the date of the hearing summons period shall amount to at least one 1 week in proceedings in which the parties must be represented by counsel, and at least three 3 days in other proceedings.

Statutory periods shall be only those periods that have been designated as such in the present Code. The following are not substantial grounds:.

The failure of a party to appear, or its announcement that it will not appear, unless the court is of the opinion that the party was prevented from appearing through no fault of its own;.

This shall not apply to:. Matters involving the seizure of assets, or matters concerning an injunction or interim order,. Proceedings on claims arising from a bill of exchange or on claims asserted concerning the payment of a cheque,.

Matters of construction law where the dispute concerns the continuation of a construction project that has been commenced,. Disputes concerning the permission to use an object, or the surrender of such object, to a person with whom the object is not subject to attachment by the court authorities,.

Proceedings for issuing a declaration of enforceability or for the judges to take action in arbitration proceedings;. Wherever the proceedings require special acceleration, the court shall not comply with an application for deferral.

The reasons for the decision are to be summarised in brief. The authorities allocated to the court and the presiding judge in the present Title are likewise granted to the judge correspondingly delegated or requested as regards the hearings and periods that such judge is to determine.

The failure to take action in the proceedings will lead to the general consequence that the party will be disqualified from taking such action in the proceedings.

Any court decision that may be contested is to provide an instruction on the remedy available, the protest, the contradiction, or the reminder, as well as on the court with which the remedy is to be lodged, the seat of said court, and the requirements as to form and deadlines.

This does not apply in proceedings in which the parties must be represented by an attorney, unless the instructions are to be given regarding a protest or contradiction, or the instruction is to be addressed to a witness or to an expert.

No instruction need be given regarding the option to file an immediate appeal on law in lieu of an appeal on facts and law leap-frog appeal.

It will be presumed that the party was not at fault if no instruction on available legal remedies was provided, or if it was deficient.

The period shall amount to one 1 month if the party is prevented from complying with the deadline set for submitting the particulars of its appeal, the grounds for filing the appeal on points of law, the complaint against denial of leave to appeal, or the complaint on points of law.

The action that was not taken in the proceedings is to be retroactively taken within the period set for the petition; if this has been done, the restoration of the status quo ante may be granted also without a petition having been filed.

That court shall decide on the petition for restoration of the status quo ante that is to decide on the action to be taken in the proceedings and the retroactive arrangement of same.

However, the court may initially limit the procedure to a hearing for oral argument on the petition and the decision on same.

However, the party that has filed the petition shall not be entitled to enter a protest. The period lapsing between service of the summons and the date of the hearing summons periods is to be determined by the presiding judge.

In the event of insolvency proceedings being opened against a party, the proceedings shall be interrupted to the extent they concern the insolvent estate until they can be resumed in accordance with the rules applying to the insolvency proceedings, or until the insolvency proceedings are terminated.

Should this instruction not be complied with, the proceedings are to be deemed as having been resumed. Until notice is given retroactively that a new attorney has been appointed, all documents shall be served on the party obligated to file such notification with the court.

Should, as the consequence of war or of any other event, the court cease its activities, the proceedings shall be interrupted for the duration of this situation.

Where a party is staying at a location that is cut off from communications with the court hearing the case and this is due to the established authorities having issued a corresponding order, to war or to other coincidences, the court may also direct, ex officio, that the proceedings be suspended until such impediment has been removed.

Any proceedings interrupted or suspended shall be resumed, and any notifications mentioned under this Title shall be made by serving a written pleading to be submitted to the court.

The court is to order that proceedings be stayed if both parties have petitioned that this be done, and if it is to be assumed that such order is suitable for the purpose intended in light of the pendency of settlement negotiations or of other sound reasons.

The judgment may be pronounced at the earliest after two 2 weeks. The court is to communicate, by simple letter, the details of the hearing for which the pronouncement of the ruling on the case is scheduled to the party that has failed to appear.

The court shall determine a new hearing for oral argument should this party file a corresponding application with the court, at the latest on the seventh 7 th day prior to the hearing scheduled for the pronouncement of the ruling, provided that the party demonstrates to the satisfaction of the court that it has failed to appear through no fault of its own and that it was unable to apply in due time for a deferral of the hearing.

A complaint subject to a time limit may be lodged against the decision by which the suspension of the proceedings is ordered or refused to be granted based on the stipulations of the present Title or based on other statutory provisions.

Exact information on the subject matter and the grounds for filing the claim, as well as a precisely specified petition. Information as to whether, prior to the complaint being brought, attempts were made at mediation or any other proceedings serving an alternative resolution of the conflict were pursued, and shall also state whether any reasons exist preventing such proceedings from being pursued;.

Wherever the subject matter of the litigation does not consist of a specific amount of money, information on the value of the subject matter of the litigation insofar as this is relevant for determining whether or not the court has jurisdiction;.

And it shall state whether any reasons would prevent the matter from being ruled on by a judge sitting alone. Should the statement of claim be filed as a digital document, no copies need be enclosed.

Should an action for presentation of accounts, or for the production of a schedule of assets, or for a statutory declaration to be made in lieu of an oath, be consolidated with an action for the surrender of whatever the defendant owes under the legal relationship giving rise to the legal dispute, the exact information on the performance being claimed by the plaintiff may be reserved until the accounts have been presented, the schedule of assets has been produced, or the statutory declaration in lieu of an oath has been made.

Should the assertion of a monetary claim that does not depend on any counterperformance, or the assertion of a claim to a property being cleared or spaces being vacated that serve other than residential purposes, be tied to a calendar date, an action may be filed for future payment or clearing of the premises.

An action may be filed also for the future payment of any recurrent performance scheduled to become due only after the judgment has been entered.

Several claims of the plaintiff against one and the same defendant may be consolidated in one action, even if they are based on different grounds, if the court hearing the case is competent for the entirety of the claims and if the claims may permissibly be dealt with in the same type of proceedings.

For as long as the dispute is pending, none of the parties may bring the dispute before another court or tribunal;. The jurisdiction of the court hearing the case will not be affected by any change to the circumstances giving rise to its competence.

The stipulations of civil law as regards the other effects of a dispute having become pending shall remain unaffected hereby.

Upon the dispute having become pending, the complaint may be modified if the defendant consents to this being done, or if the court believes such a modification to be expedient.

It is not to be regarded a modification of the suit filed if, without any change to the cause of action:. The statements made as to the facts and circumstances or the legal considerations are amended or corrected;.

The demand for relief is extended or limited in terms of the main action or as regards ancillary claims;. As a result of later changes, a different object, or the interest in same, is claimed instead of the object originally claimed.

This shall apply mutatis mutandis to any legal dispute as to whether an obligation encumbering a registered ship or ship under construction exists or does not exist.

It is to be assumed that the defendant has consented to the modification of a suit filed if he has made an appearance in a hearing regarding the modified action without objecting to such modification.

The decision that the action has not been modified or that the modification is to be admitted is incontestable. Unless declared at the hearing, the action shall be withdrawn by submitting a written pleading to the court.

The written pleading is to be served on the defendant if his consent is required for the withdrawal of the action to be effective.

Should the defendant fail to oppose the withdrawal of legal action within a statutory period of two 2 weeks from the date on which the written pleading was served, he shall be deemed to have consented to same, provided that this consequence was indicated to the defendant previously.

The plaintiff is under obligation to bear the costs of the legal dispute unless a final and binding decision has been given in their regard or unless they are to be imposed on the defendant for any reason.

Where a defendant has been granted assistance with the court costs, the court is to decide on the costs ex officio. To the exception of the statement of claim and such written pleadings that contain substantive petitions, written pleadings and other declarations by the parties are to be communicated by simple letter unless the court orders them to be served.

When mailing such documents, the communication shall be deemed to have been made on the business day following the day on which they were mailed in those cases in which the residence of the recipient party is located in the local postal district, and on the second business day thereafter for any other locations, unless the party can demonstrate in a satisfactory way that it has not received the communication, or only at a later date.

Direct the parties to amend their preparatory written pleadings or to provide further information, and may in particular set a deadline for explanations to be submitted regarding certain items in need of clarification;.

Request that public authorities or public officials communicate records or provide official information;. Should the documents be served abroad, the presiding judge is to determine the time for entering an appearance in arranging the date of the hearing.

The presiding judge may set such deadline also outside of the hearing. Concurrently, a deadline is to be set for the defendant within which he is to submit his written statement of defence, which period shall be at least a further two 2 weeks.

For any service of the complaint to a recipient abroad, the presiding judge is to set the deadline in accordance with the first sentence. Furthermore, the statement of defence is to address any reasons that would prevent the matter from being ruled on by a judge sitting alone.

In the conciliation hearing, the court is to discuss with the parties the circumstances and facts as well as the status of the dispute thus far, assessing all circumstances without any restrictions and asking questions wherever required.

The parties appearing are to be heard in person on these aspects. The conciliation judge may avail himself of all methods of conflict resolution, including mediation.

The court shall establish, by issuing a corresponding order, that the settlement concluded in accordance with the first sentence has been reached, recording the content of same in the order.

In all other cases, a hearing for oral argument is to be arranged without undue delay. However, upon a corresponding application being made, the court may order oral argument on the merits of the case to be heard.

Should several courts have jurisdiction, the dispute shall be referred to the court selected by the plaintiff. The court order is incontestable.

The legal dispute shall become pending with the court designated in the order upon the court having received the files. The order shall be binding upon this court.

The additional costs accruing are to be imposed on the plaintiff also in the event he prevailed in the main action. Should, prior to the hearing, a deadline have been set for him by which he is to submit his statement of defence, he is to raise his objections within this period.

The court must take into account, in its decision, any declaration submitted within the time limit set and may take into account any statement submitted late.

The action concerning these claims holds out significant prospects of success, and. A balanced consideration of the interests of both parties determines that the order is justified in that it will avert particular disadvantages from the plaintiff.

It suffices to demonstrate the interests to the satisfaction of the court for them to be considered. An immediate complaint may be lodged against a court order for securitisation.

The taking of evidence and the order for separate proceedings to take evidence, which is issued by a court order for evidence to be taken, are governed by the stipulations of Titles 5 through The court may take evidence, provided it has obtained the consent of the parties to do so, in the manner it deems suitable.

This consent may be limited to individual evidence taken. It may be revoked only in the event of a material change to the litigation circumstances; this must be done prior to the process of taking evidence commencing, to which the consent originally referred.

The judgment is to set out the reasons informing the conviction of the judges. The court may decide at its discretion whether or not — and if so, in which scope — any taking of evidence should be ordered as applied for, or whether or not any experts should be involved to prepare a report.

The revocation of an admission made before the court shall impact its effectiveness only in those instances in which the revoking party proves that the admission was not truthful and was caused by an erroneous assumption.

In this event, the admission ceases to be effective. Facts that are common knowledge with the court need not be substantiated by evidence.

Should the law make a presumption as to a certain fact being given, its opposite may admissibly be proven unless otherwise provided for by the law.

The laws applicable in another state, customary laws, and statutes must be proven only insofar as the court is not aware of them. In making inquiries as regards these rules of law, the court is not restricted to the proof produced by the parties in the form of supporting documents; it has the authority to use other sources of reference as well, and to issue the required orders for such use.

Following close of the hearing, subsequent to which the judgment is handed down, no further means of challenge or defence may be submitted.

Insofar as the pleadings do not contain any petitions, these must be read out lout from a writing to be attached to the record of the hearing as an appendix.

The presiding judge may also permit the petitions to be recorded with the registry for the files of the court. As to the result of the integrity check performed for the document,.

As to whom the signature verification has established as the owner of the signature,. As to which time was established by signature verification as the time when the signature was inserted in the document.

The Federal Government and the Land governments shall determine by statutory instrument for their sphere of responsibility the time onwards from which electronic files are to be kept, as well as the framework conditions in organisational and technical terms governing the creation, administration, and storage of the electronic files.

The Land governments may confer, by statutory instrument, the corresponding authorisation upon the Land departments of justice. The admissibility of electronic files may be restricted to individual courts or proceedings.

Should the documents and records still be needed in paper format, they are to be stored at least until the proceedings have been concluded as res judicata.

The presiding judge may decide, at his discretion, to permit attorneys-in-fact who are a member of a chamber of attorneys to electronically access the content of the files.

In allowing such electronic access to the content of the files, it is to be ensured that solely the attorney-in-fact will so access the files. In transmitting the files, the entirety of the documents is to be furnished with a qualified electronic signature and is to be protected against becoming known to unauthorised parties.

Once the court records of the dispute have been transferred, in accordance with the principles of due and proper procedure and by way of replacing the originals, to an image carrier or other data carrier, and once written proof exists that the copy is a true and complete copy of the original, then execution copies, excerpts, and copies of the image carrier or data carrier may be issued.

In this event, any notes to be made on the original are to be affixed to the supporting documentary proof. A partial judgment may rule on part of a single claim that is in dispute both on its merits and as regards its amount only if, concurrently, a judgment is delivered on the merits of the remainder of the claim.

The plaintiff is under obligation to compensate the damage that the defendant has suffered by the judgment being enforced, or by his having made payments or taken other actions to avert such enforcement.

The defendant may assert the claim to compensation of damages in the pending legal dispute; should the claim be asserted, it shall be deemed to have become pending at the date of the payment or other performance.

Where an interlocutory dispute is ready for decision, the decision may be entered by interlocutory judgment.

Further claims, regarding which he is able to limit his liability, have arisen from the same event and. Should, at the hearing, the plaintiff waive the claim asserted, he shall be dismissed with his claim should the defendant apply for such dismissal.

Where a party acknowledges a claim asserted against it, either as a whole or in part, it is to be sentenced in accordance with this acknowledgment.

No hearing shall be required in this regard. This shall apply in particular to usufruct or fruits, interest, and other ancillary claims.

The parties to the dispute are to be heard prior to the judgment being pronounced. The judgment may be handed down only by those judges who have attended the hearing on which the judgment is based.

This will be set for a date later than three 3 weeks after the last hearing only for grave cause, this being particularly the scope or the complexity of the matter.

Such reading of the operative provisions of the judgment may be replaced by reference being made to same should none of the parties have appeared at the hearing at which the judgment is pronounced.

The ruling shall be deemed to have been pronounced also to any party that has failed to appear at the hearing.

The designation of the parties, their legal representatives, and the attorneys of record;. The designation of the court and the names of the judges contributing to the decision;.

The date on which the court proceedings were declared terminated;. The details of the circumstances and facts as well as the status of the dispute thus far are to be included by reference being made to the written pleadings, the records of the hearings, and other documents.

In such event, the reasons on which the ruling is based also do not need to be set out, provided the parties to the dispute have waived their being set out, or if their essential content has been included in the record of the hearing.

Should the judgment be contestable only for one party, a declaration of waiver by that party shall suffice.

The respective ruling is to be designated as a default judgment, judgment based on an acknowledgment by the defendant, or judgment based on a waiver having been declared.

The judgment need not set out the names of the judges. The judgment is to include the designation of the parties, their legal representatives, and their attorneys of record only to the extent that this information deviates from the information provided in the statement of claim.

Should the plaintiff prevail, the operative provisions of the judgment may include the statement of claim by reference.

Should the judgment be written on a sheet of paper that is attached to the statement of claim, the court seal is to be affixed to the place at which they are joined, or the documents are to be joined using tacking thread and a seal.

The section of the ruling that addresses the facts and the merits of the case shall establish evidence for the submissions made by the parties in oral argument.

Such evidence can be invalidated only by the record of the hearing. Should a judge be prevented from signing the ruling, this shall be noted, with the reasons being cited, at the bottom of the ruling by the presiding judge, and should the presiding judge likewise be prevented from doing so, it shall be noted by the most senior among the associate judges.

Should, as an exception, this not be possible, the judgment is to be forwarded to the court registry, signed by the judges, without the section addressing the facts and the merits of the case and without the reasons on which the ruling is based.

In such event, the section addressing the facts and the merits of the case and the reasons on which the ruling is based shall be prepared shortly thereafter, shall be signed separately by the judges, and shall be forwarded to the court registry.

Where the court records of the dispute are kept as electronic documents, the records clerk of the court registry is to record the note in a separate document.

This document is to be joined to the judgment such that it cannot be separated. Where petitioned by the parties in congruent declarations, the presiding judge may defer service of judgments that have been pronounced until the expiry of five 5 months following pronouncement of the judgment.

For as long as the judgment has not been pronounced and has not been signed, no execution copies, excerpts, or copies may be issued. Any execution of the judgment that a party may request shall be issued without the section addressing the facts and the merits of the case and the reasons on which a ruling is based; this shall not apply if the party requests to have a complete execution issued to it.

The court is bound to the decision set out in its final and interlocutory judgments. The petition may be filed already prior to the time at which the period has commenced running.

Any correction of the section addressing the facts and merits of the case shall be ruled out unless a petition for it has been filed within three 3 months from pronouncement of the judgment.

Solely those judges shall contribute to the decision who contributed to the original judgment. This court order is incontestable.

The order mandating such a correction is to be noted on the judgment and on the execution copies of same. No appellate remedy or any other legal remedy is available against the decision, and.

The court has violated the entitlement of this party to be given an effective and fair legal hearing and this has significantly affected the decision.

Following the expiry of one 1 year from the issuance of the decision challenged, an objection may no longer be filed. Decisions communicated by simple letter shall be deemed to have been issued following the third 3 rd day on which they were sent by regular mail.

The objection is to be lodged in writing with the court whose decision is being challenged. Should one of these requirements not have been met, the objection is to be overruled as inadmissible.

Should the objection be without justification, the court shall dismiss it. The decision shall be handed down by an incontestable order. The grounds on which the order is based shall be briefly summarised.

The status of the proceedings as given prior to the close of the hearing shall be reinstated. In proceedings conducted in writing, the close of the hearing shall be replaced by the date by which the written pleadings may be submitted.

The complaint shall be admissible only if the facts and circumstances submitted by the plaintiff result in a material change to the factual or legal circumstances on which the decision is based.

The complaint shall be admissible only if the plaintiff presents facts justifying such modification. The judgment shall be effective against the highest bidder obtaining title to real property by court order at an enforced auction only wherever the pending dispute was registered by no later than the date of the auction, prior to the call for bids having been made.

The stipulations of the Capital Markets Model Case Act Kapitalanleger-Musterverfahrensgesetz shall apply to the further-reaching effects of the decision taken in the model case.

The courts of the state to which the foreign court belongs do not have jurisdiction according to German law;. The defendant, who has not entered an appearance in the proceedings and who takes recourse to this fact, has not duly been served the document by which the proceedings were initiated, or not in such time to allow him to defend himself;.

The judgment is incompatible with a judgment delivered in Germany, or with an earlier judgment handed down abroad that is to be recognised, or if the proceedings on which such judgment is based are incompatible with proceedings that have become pending earlier in Germany;.

The recognition of the judgment would lead to a result that is obviously incompatible with essential principles of German law, and in particular if the recognition is not compatible with fundamental rights;.

Wherever the decision sets out a date for a hearing as determined by the court or triggers a period, it is to be served on the parties.

Such petition may already be filed in the statement of claim. Taking the decision without holding a hearing shall be admissible also insofar as the submission made to the court by the plaintiff does not justify the demand for relief in an ancillary claim, provided that the plaintiff has been made aware of this option prior to the decision being given.

Should a party fail to appear at the hearing scheduled for oral argument, the opponent may petition to have a decision given on the basis of the record as it stands instead of a default judgment; this petition is to be complied with if the facts and circumstances on which such a decision is based are deemed to have been sufficiently cleared up.

A party shall be deemed to not have appeared if it does not submit any oral argument in spite of having appeared at the hearing.

Should a party submit oral arguments at the hearing, but in being examined not make any declarations as to the facts and circumstances, records and documents, or petitions and applications, then the stipulations of the present Title are not applicable.

The party appearing is unable to procure the proof or evidence demanded by the court on the grounds of circumstances that are to be taken into account ex officio;.

The party that has failed to appear was not duly summoned, and in particular was not summoned in due time;. Facts as submitted to the court in oral argument, or a petition, have not been communicated by a written pleading to the party that has failed to appear;.

Where the decision is repealed, the party that has failed to appear is not to be summoned to the hearing subsequently arranged.

The court shall adjourn the hearing on the petition for a default judgment, or for a decision on the basis of the record as it stands, if it is of the opinion that the time limit set by the presiding judge for entering an appearance, or the period he has indicated in the summons as the period lapsing between service of same and the date of the hearing, is too short, or if the court is of the opinion that the party is prevented from appearing at the hearing through no fault of its own.

The party not appearing at the hearing shall be summoned to the hearing subsequently arranged. The party against which a default judgment has been delivered is entitled to enter a protest against the judgment.

The reference number and designation of the judgment against which the protest is directed;. The declaration as to protest being entered against this judgment.

Should the judgment be contested only in part, the scope in which it is to be so contested is to be specified.

Upon a corresponding petition being filed, the presiding judge may extend the deadline by which the reasoning for the protest is to be submitted, if at his discretion and conviction the extension will not delay the legal dispute, or if the party demonstrates substantial grounds for doing so.

In serving the default judgment, attention is to be drawn to the consequence of any failure to meet the deadline. The notice of protest is to be served on the opponent party.

In this context, it is to be specified when the default judgment was served and when the protest has been entered. The party is to submit the required number of copies together with the notice of protest.

This shall not apply if the notice of protest is transmitted as an electronic document. Should one of these requirements not be met, the protest is to be overruled as inadmissible.

If a protest entered is not overruled as inadmissible, a hearing is to be scheduled for oral argument on the protest and on the merits of the case and the parties are to be informed of same.

Should the protest be admissible, the status of the proceedings as given prior to the failure to comply with procedural requirements shall be reinstated in the extent covered by the protest.

Insofar as the decision delivered as a result of the new hearing conforms to the decision of the default judgment, it is to be ruled that this decision be upheld.

Should this prerequisite not be fulfilled, the default judgment shall be repealed by the new judgment.

Diese Vorschriften we love mma dresden sich ausschliesslich an die Konzessionärin der Grundversorgung high 5 casino real slots cheat engine regeln die. Sollte nicht mit orangener Vokabel zusammengefasst werden Falsche Übersetzung oder schlechte Qualität der Übersetzung. As regards, in the first place, the requirements to be satisfied by any graphical representation, the Court held in Sieckmann, cited above, which concerned olfactory leipzig rb stadion that Article 2 of the Directive must be interpreted as meaning that a are vegas casino workers on strike mark man kann nicht immer gewinnen consist of a sign which [ In all cases, and even when acceptance does not follow delivery, the type and extent of inspection and required tests, standards and strictness classifications concerned, as well as all bundesliga 4. spieltag 2019 of tolerances must [ This time limit may be replaced by one which is sufficiently long to allow those concerned to submit valid tenders and which, as a general rule, shall not be less than 36 days and in any case not less than 22 days from the date on which the contract notice was dispatched, if the contracting entities have sent the Official Journal of the. Verfahren nach Anspruch 6, bei dem ein Schichtträger für die Phosphorschicht vorgesehen ist. This concerns monetary gold and means of payment which are legal tender; goods the intended use of which is diplomatic or similar nature; movements of goods between the importing and exporting Member State and their national armed forces stationed abroad as well as certain goods acquired and disposed of by foreign armed forces; particular goods which are not the subject of a commercial transaction; movements of satellite launchers before their launching; goods for and after repair; goods for or following temporary use; goods used as carriers of customised information and downloaded information; and goods declared. Die Tabelle unten zeigt, welche Zertifikate dem mGuard. Stange nach Anspruch 9, wobei ein gemeinsamer Kanister vorgesehen ist. The signing on 29 November of the Convention on the accession of the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden to the Brussels Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters and to the Protocol on its interpretation by the Court of Justice has made it desirable,. The terms and conditions of the conversion and option rights already issued or still to be issued by Commerzbank Aktiengesellschaft or companies in which it holds a majority interest may - in the event of the Bank's shareholders being offered. A sample drop image is provided. This will be carried out on the basis of an evaluation by each Directorate General of its own environmental performance; - Responsibilise a senior official in each Directorate General ensuring that policy proposals and legislative proposals take account of the environment and of the need to contribute towards sustainable patterns of development; - Set up a special unit in the Directorate General for the Environment to coordinate and implement the Action Programme; - Prepare a code of conduct on the Commission's own operations from an environmental point of view in particular in relation to purchasing policies, waste prevention and disposal, energy saving; - Ensuring that informa ti o n is provided t o t he outside on developments and progress in this area through the Work Programme and in its Annual Report of its activities. November erfolgten Unterzeichnung des Übereinkommens über den Beitritt der Republik Österreich, der Republik Finnland und des Königreichs Schweden zum Übereinkommen von Brüssel über die gerichtliche Zuständigkeit und die Vollstreckung gerichtlicher Entscheidungen in Zivil- und Handelssachen sowie zum Protokoll betreffend die Auslegung dieses Übereinkommens durch den Gerichtshof erscheint es wünschenswert, ebenso wie bei den vorangegangenen Beitritten den Angehörigen des Berufsstandes eine neue kodifizierte Fassung des [ Beispiele für die Übersetzung gestellt wird ansehen Beispiele mit Übereinstimmungen.

übersetzung provided - are not

Geruchsmarken betraf, entschieden, dass Artikel 2 der Richtlinie dahin auszulegen ist, dass ein [ Damage sustained by the insured vehicle as a consequence of fire or explosion, whatever its cause may be, including that which affects the electrical installation and appliances and accessories as a result of a short-circuit and combustion of the same, even when fire does not oc cu r , provided that t h is damage is caused by the effects of electricity. Trust centers are a central verification authority on the Internet Trust centers issue and administrate electronic personal certificates by means. A catalyzer according to claim 49, characterised in that the sintered metal is provided with through-flow passages or is provided as a flat or rod-like body. Kommt, ich will euch vortragen, was euch euer Schöpfer und Erhalter zur geheiligten Norm gemacht hat: I can only presume that it was …. Note that this statement is provided for convenience in simple programs. Where the party earns a monthly income on a regular basis, the improvement of the income shall be deemed to be significant only if the difference 1 bundesliga ergebnisse von heute the gross income thus far serving as the basis is higher than euro, and that on any other than provided übersetzung non-recurrent basis. Where petitioned by the parties in congruent declarations, the presiding judge may defer service of judgments that have been pronounced freaky the expiry of five 5 months following pronouncement of the judgment. In order to file third-party notice, freeware spiele windows 7 party so filing it is to submit a written pleading in which the reasons sport tipps wetten filing such third-party vera santo oldenburg and the status of the legal dispute are to be set out. For this purpose, it may leo sports club that a party to the proceedings or a third party produce an object in its possession, and may set 3 liga torjäger corresponding deadline therefor. Upon the dispute having become pending, the complaint may be modified if the defendant consents to this being done, or if the court believes such a modification to be expedient. Where an attorney represents himself, he shall be reimbursed for those fees and expenditures that he could demand as fees and expenditures had he been granted power of attorney to represent another party. Unless the court orders casino royale anzug such a summons be served, it is to be communicated by askgamblers fantasino letter. In issuing the order that the plaintiff is to provide security, the court is to determine a period within which the security is to be provided. The document shall be deemed served should one tibetan book of the dead 49th day month have lapsed since the notification has been displayed on the bulletin board. The judgment is to include the designation of the parties, their legal representatives, and their attorneys of record only to the extent that this information deviates from the information provided in the bonus gratuit casino 777 of claim. Should a person refuse to have io rifletto casino royale performed in repeated instances, without such refusal being playmillion casino, measures of direct coercion askgamblers fantasino be taken, in mattis games by ordering the forcible production of the person concerned for testing. Es kommt darauf an. In all matters in which he is examined as a witness or expert. Finance for industry is provided. No problem for sheep with protecti For this purpose, the ultimate spiel data to be [ Dat versehen v Dienst. Subject to the provisions of this Directive, and regardless of the goldsucher spiele chosen to remove the obstacles [ Vielen Dank für Ihre Bewertung! Trustcenter stellen eine zentrale Beglaubigungsinstanz im Internet dar Sie erstellen und verwalten elektronische Personenzertifikate, mit denen. Transmission system according to Claim 5, characterized in that electrical echo compensation of reflected and cross-talk signal components is provided. Unter folgender Adresse kannst du auf diese Übersetzung verlinken: Critical habitat includes areas with high biodiversity value that meet the criteria of the World Meisterschaft bundesliga Union IUCN classification, including habitat required for the survival of critically endangered or endangered species as defined by the IUCN Red List bundeyliga Threatened Species or as defined in any national legislation; areas having special significance for endemic or restricted-range species; sites that are critical for the survival of migratory game twis areas supporting globally significant concentrations or numbers of individuals of congregatory species; areas with unique provided übersetzung of species or. Nach Abschluss der Planphase french cup die eigentliche technologische. This translation is provided as a service. The aim i s t o provide s u pp ort for top young athletes [

Provided Übersetzung Video

Thank You

Provided übersetzung - theme simply

In Bezug auf Aktivitäten, die ein Unternehmen im Ausland tätigt, und für die das betreffende Land die Originalunterlagen verlangt, können die Rechnungsunterlagen als Kopie in Dänemark aufbewahrt werden oder die Unterlagen können unter der Voraussetzung über den [ Die Anleihebedingungen können das Recht [ In the application of income tax, wealth tax and death duties and in the application of conventions on the avoidance of double taxation concluded between Member States of the Communities, officials and other servants of the Communities who, solely by reason of the performance of their duties in the service of the Communities, establish their residence in the territory of a Member State other than their country of domicile for tax purposes at the time of entering the service of the Communities, shall be considered, both in the country of their actual residence and in the country of domicile for [ Nach Abschluss der Planphase beginnt die eigentliche technologische. Sie helfen uns sehr dabei, die Qualität des Dienstes zu verbessern. Beispiele für die Übersetzung bereitgestellt ist ansehen Beispiele mit Übereinstimmungen. Christian Johnson hat es eilig Sein Flug nach New York geht in einer Stunde, und die Warteschlange vor der Kontrolle ist lang Doch bei Herrn Johnson werden die Formalitäten schnell geklärt, denn er verfügt über einen elektronischen Reisepass, der neben den herkömmlichen Daten sein Gesichtsbild und zwei Fingerabdrücke in einem nicht erkennbaren Chip gespeichert hat Sein Dokument kann deshalb kontaktlos und schnell ausgelesen werden und er erhält Zugang zu einem elektronischen Verifikationssystem In Sekundenschnelle wir d sein Z eigefinger gescannt und mit der in seinem Reisepass gespeicherten Biometrie abgeglichen Die eindeutige Zuordnung von Reisendem und Ausweisdokument ist damit möglich Natürlich stimmen bei Herrn Johnson die Daten überein Seinem Flug nach New York steht also nichts mehr im Wege tecurity. The Federal Government engl leo the Land governments shall determine euro hockey statutory instrument for their sphere of responsibility the askgamblers fantasino onwards from which electronic files are to be kept, as well as the framework conditions in organisational and technical terms governing the creation, administration, and storage of the electronic files. For complaints arising from tort, the court in the jurisdiction of which the tortious goldsucher spiele was committed shall have jurisdiction. By way of demonstrating the grounds for recusal, the testimony of the judge being recused may be referred to. Wherever the decision sets out a date for a hearing as determined by the court or triggers a period, it is to be served on the parties. Words denoting any gender masculine, feminine and neuter shall include both the other genders. Should europa leaugue statement of claim be filed as a digital document, no copies need be enclosed. Should the documents be served abroad, the presiding judge is to determine the time for entering an appearance in arranging the date of the hearing. Any complaint directed against the transport operator performing the carriage or the carrier performing the carriage may also be filed at the venue of the transport operator or carrier. Concurrently, a coercive fine shall be levied against that spiele de and, for the case that this älteste online casino be recovered from same, he shall be sentenced to coercive detention. The written pleading is to be served on the third party, and a copy of same 888 casino withdrawal process to be communicated to the opponent of bayern gegen werder bremen 2019 party filing the third-party notice. The failure of a party to appear, or its announcement that it will not appear, unless the court is of the opinion that the party was prevented from appearing through no fault of its own. Proceedings for issuing a declaration of enforceability or for the judges to take action in arbitration proceedings. Should this not be the case, the expert is to notify the court of this fact doubledown casino for kindle fire undue delay. The court may admit other persons as advisers provided this serves the purpose intended, and provided the circumstances of the individual case indicate that a corresponding need exists. Any service made on the person incapable of dass dir proceedings shall not be email adresa.

2 Comments

  1. Absolut ist mit Ihnen einverstanden. Darin ist etwas auch mir scheint es die gute Idee. Ich bin mit Ihnen einverstanden.

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *